Platform

Global Taxation Systems Database

How tax systems work in different countries, what rates apply, and how fiscal structures shape wealth accumulation and distribution across economies.

Understanding Tax Systems and Wealth

Taxation is one of the most direct instruments through which governments shape the distribution of wealth within an economy. The structure of a country's tax system β€” whether it relies primarily on income taxes, consumption taxes, property taxes, or capital gains levies β€” has profound implications for how capital is formed, retained, and transferred across generations.

Our database covers the major tax categories in over 190 jurisdictions: personal income tax (including marginal rates and thresholds), corporate income tax, value-added tax (VAT), capital gains tax, inheritance and estate tax, and dividend withholding tax. For each category, we provide current statutory rates, effective rates where available, and notes on major structural features.

The data is sourced from the OECD Tax Database, IMF Fiscal Monitor, national tax authorities, and PwC's Worldwide Tax Summaries. All information is updated periodically and is intended for informational and research purposes only.

Tax systems and fiscal policy research
190+
Jurisdictions covered
6
Tax categories tracked
Q3 2025
Last data update
OECD
Primary data source

Country Tax Rate Comparison

Select a region to filter the table. All rates are statutory as of Q3 2025. Effective rates may differ.

This data is for informational purposes only. Tax laws change frequently. Always consult official sources or a qualified tax professional for advice.

Country Corporate Tax Top Income Tax VAT / GST Capital Gains Inheritance Tax System Type
πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ Germany ~30% 45% 19% 26.4% Up to 50% Progressive
πŸ‡«πŸ‡· France 25% 45% 20% 30% Up to 60% Progressive
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ United Kingdom 25% 45% 20% 28% 40% Progressive
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ Switzerland ~18% ~37% 8.1% 0% (federal) Varies by canton Progressive / Federal
πŸ‡³πŸ‡± Netherlands 25.8% 49.5% 21% Varies (Box 3) Up to 40% Box system
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺ Estonia 0% retained 20% 22% 20% None Flat / Distributed
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 21% 37% Varies by state Up to 20% Up to 40% Progressive / Federal
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Canada ~26% ~53% 5% (GST) 50% inclusion None (deemed disposal) Progressive / Federal
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Brazil 34% 27.5% ~17% (ICMS) 15–22.5% Up to 8% (ITCMD) Progressive
πŸ‡§πŸ‡Έ Bahamas 0% 0% 12% (VAT) 0% None No income tax
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ Singapore 17% 24% 9% (GST) 0% None Territorial / Low-rate
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ Japan ~23% 55% 10% 20% Up to 55% Progressive
πŸ‡­πŸ‡° Hong Kong 16.5% 17% None 0% None Territorial
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Australia 30% 47% 10% (GST) 50% discount None Progressive
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ UAE 9% 0% 5% (VAT) 0% None Territorial / Low-rate
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦ Saudi Arabia 20% 0% 15% (VAT) 0% None Territorial
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ South Africa 27% 45% 15% (VAT) 18% 20% (donations tax) Progressive

Key Structural Patterns

Common patterns in how tax systems are designed and what effects they tend to produce on capital formation.

Territorial vs. Worldwide Taxation

Territorial systems tax only income earned domestically, while worldwide systems tax global income of residents. This distinction is critical for multinational capital planning. Singapore, Hong Kong, and the UAE are examples of territorial systems that attract significant international capital.

Progressive vs. Flat Rate Structures

Progressive systems impose higher marginal rates on higher incomes. Flat-rate systems apply a single rate regardless of income. Eastern European countries like Estonia pioneered modern flat-rate income tax systems in the 1990s, influencing a wave of reforms across the region.

Capital Gains Treatment

How a country taxes realized gains on the sale of assets profoundly affects where investors choose to hold and transact assets. Some jurisdictions β€” notably Singapore, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and Switzerland β€” impose no capital gains tax at the federal level, creating distinct incentives for wealth retention.

Explore capital movement alongside taxation data